In brief
The Justice Department’s Antitrust Division has announced a probe into ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News after they stopped sharing news footage of President Trump with other outlets. The boycott stemmed from the administration’s decision in September to strip certain media from the presidential pool, citing false claims by those outlets. A judge later restored access, but the networks questioned whether the White House’s actions violated the Sherman Act. The DoJ is reviewing communications to determine if the collective boycott constituted a monopolistic restraint of competition. The case adds to a series of disputes between Trump’s White House and the press over coverage and access.
The U.S. Justice Department has opened an antitrust investigation into five major broadcasters after they halted shared coverage of President Donald Trump. The networks—ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News—were questioned for potentially violating federal competition law when they temporarily stopped contributing to the presidential press pool following a White House decision to strip certain outlets of credentials.
The boycott arose after the Trump administration withdrew access for CNN, MSNBC and Politico in September, citing claims that those outlets had spread misinformation about the administration. A federal judge later restored the media’s access, but the networks continued to protest, arguing that the administration’s actions infringed on their First Amendment rights.
Under the Sherman Act, businesses can be prohibited from engaging in activities that threaten to create monopolistic control or unfairly restrict competition. The Antitrust Division has requested communications from the five broadcasters to assess whether the collective withdrawal of coverage amounted to an illegal restraint of trade.
Washington has a record of confronting major media outlets over coverage criticism, including lawsuits tied to language used in reporting and restrictions on access to key locations. The current investigation comes amid a larger debate over the role of the White House press pool and how media should operate within the constraints set by executive authority.
While the broadcasters have not yet responded to the Department’s inquiry, the case underscores the tension between keeping the press independent and ensuring that government access to information remains fairly distributed.
